Tim Farron MP - Working for Westmorland and Lonsdale

Farron argues for a "better balance" with CRB checks for volunteers

4.49.46pm GMT Tue 7th Oct 2008

Criminal Records Bureau logo

Local MP Tim Farron has expressed his concern that excessive CRB checks are deterring people from volunteering and has called for a simplification of the process to protect children and reduce bureaucracy.

Mr Farron tabled an Early Day motion in the House of Commons calling for the Government to provide greater monitoring of inappropriate checks.

Tim's motion comes after it was revealed that last year 240,000 CRB applications were wrongly confused with other forms.

Commenting Mr Farron said:

"No one would disagree that CRB checks play a vital role in protecting the vulnerable; but this doesn't mean that the system can't be improved.

"What we have now is a system that is so inflexible that thousands of people are being forced to have multiple checks for different jobs because the checks are not transferable from one to another.

"In my own personal experience, I have two CRB checks for two voluntary roles I perform in my local community - teaching at Sunday School, and volunteering with the local Youth Group. Like many other volunteers, I ask myself the question 'why can't one check suffice for both roles?

"The current system of excessive checks has created a massive barrier standing in the way of people who want to volunteer."

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook LibDigLibDig redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story.
Previous news story: "Boom-Bust Cycle Must be avoided" - says Farron (Tue 7th Oct 2008).
Next news story: Farron Presses Housing Minister to Support "Home on the Farm" (Thu 9th Oct 2008).

Related News Stories:

Thu 17th Jul 2008:

Wed 11th Jul 2007:

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 82b Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BX.
Published and promoted by Tim Farron MP, The Cottage, Yard 2, Stricklandgate, Kendal LA9 4ND.
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.